of Hongkong, I have the honour to inform you that I referred the question to His Excellency the General Officer Commanding for an expression of his opinion as to the sufficiency or otherwise of the penalties provided by Ordinance 1 of 1895.
2.
I enclose a copy of General Black's reply, from which it will be seen that he considers that the penalties provided by Ordinance are not sufficiently heavy except in the case of torpedo installations. I see no objection to amending the law on the lines suggested by General Black as far as relates to torpedo installations, and I concur with him in the desirability of the presence, at trials under this Ordinance or Ordinance 10 of 1891, of a Military Officer who could give an opinion as to the degree of the offence committed.
3.
With reference to paragraph...
of Hongkong, I have the honour that I referred
to inform you
the question to His Excellency the General Officer Command- ing for an expression of his as to the sufficiency or otherwise of the penalties provided by Ordinance 1 of 1895.
opinion
2.
Conclosure
I enclose a copy of graduly,
General Black's reply, from
which it will be
seen
that
he considers that the highest
Ordinance are
1896.7
357
heavy except in the case of torpedo installations. I see no objection to amending the law on the lines suggested by General Black
far
as relates
to torpedo installations, and
I
concur with him in the desirability of the presence, !
at trials under this Ordinance
or Ordinance 10 of 1891, of a n Military Officer who could
give
an
the
3.
penalties provided by
sufficiently.~
heavy
opinion
as
to the de:
gree of the offence committed.
With reference
to
paragraf'n
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.